BOOK REVIEW | "MEET ME IN THE BATHROOM: REBIRTH AND ROCK AND ROLL IN NEW YORK CITY 2001-2011" BY LIZZY GOODMAN
photo & text by nacrowe
i want to start this off by saying that i love NYC. ever since i visited my grandmother in BAY RIDGE from my home southern CALIFORNIA back in the early 90s i've been under it's spell.
so i get where the participants of the early 2000s INDIE ROCK / ELECTROCLASH / PARTY scene, who were interviewed for this oral history MEET ME IN THE BATHROOM (DEY STREET, 2017) compiled by LIZZY GOODMAN, are coming from. some are transplants, some where native, some had money, some didn't. but what they shared was the belief that NYC should be the premier hub of creativity.
my problem is that too many times in this book, people are looking to the past. looking to their record collections. looking to each other. full disclosure: i was an undergraduate during this period at nearby RUTGERS UNIVERSIRTY in nearby NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY, a mere 20-minute NJ TRANSIT ride from manhattan. i knew people that were into these bands, groups like the THE WALKMEN, THE MOUNTAIN GOATS and THE MAGNETIC FIELDS. personally i thought their fans were pompous, self-important assholes back in the day. and this book has only further confirmed that deep bias.
i'm certain when IGGY POP or JOEY RAMONE started bands back in the day, they did so out of a need to A) get the hell out of MICHIGAN / QUEENS and B) express their displeasure with the current state of american culture/politics/society. this 00s scene as showcased through this book showcase a self-involved base of musicians from the likes of LCD SOUNDSYSTEM and others who were more concerned with projecting their tastes over the pulse of popular culture in an almost manic HIGH FIDELITY (TOUCHSTONE, 2000) record-store-dick like manner. why do i care if JAMES MURPHY is "losing his edge" to the next generation of musicians and music fans? i never got that. you're old, get over it.
and thats what gets me. frontman MAYNARD JAMES KEENAN (and nonmember of this scene or book participant) of metal-band TOOL once opined "fuck retro anything" in a song and in a way i totally understand that mentality. why recreate the past? during this period i felt like rock took a step back and started attempting to try to bring back "real" rock music a la THE VELVET UNDERGROUND, 13TH FLOOR EVELATORS, THE ROLLING STONES, etc. at least that is what it sounded like to me. what was the point of that? if i wanted to listen to garage rock i could always go back and listen to NUGGETS or any STOOGES albums, which i loved. why attempt to recreate that now in a different cultural moment? just seemed there wasn't much risk taking during this period.
then and now that instinct to recreate the past as a way of projecting your great taste just seems counterproductive and masturbatory at best. hey, at least nu-metal tried (and failed) to do something new. for my taste this millennial NYC-based indie-rock to me is as revolutionary as a NORMAN ROCKWELL painting. literally paint-by-numbers art and enjoyed by new generation of like-minded, corporate tastemakers of a predominantly upperclass white demographic.
don't get me wrong, this book is conceived and expertly compiled, as you really get a sense of the scene developing over time in BROOKLYN in now-gentrified sections of WILLIAMSBURG and GREENPOINT. so i do not fault the author at all. if anything by letting the participants speak it showcased their vacuity and self-involvement in a manner now author could adequately expose. to me this book is the embodiment of the GENTRIFICATION ethos of that period. in the post-truth world we live in today, maybe this scene, often obsessed over notions of "authenticity" spearheaded us towards our current cultural moment where nothing matters, anything can be bought just as they did 20 years ago.